Acts 2:38 — Heretic-Proof Refutation (Final)

“Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.”
(KJV, Textus Receptus)

🔴 The False Claim:

“Peter says you must be baptized to receive forgiveness. The phrase ‘for the remission of sins’ means baptism is required for salvation.”

✅ The Truth:

Acts 2:38 does not teach that water baptism is required for eternal salvation.

It teaches:

• Repentance brings forgiveness (as everywhere else in Scripture),

• And baptism follows as a public sign of that forgiveness — not as the means to get it.

SECTION 1: 🔍 What Was Happening in Acts 2?

• Peter is preaching to Jews who had crucified their Messiah (Acts 2:23, 36).

• When convicted, they cried:

  “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” (v. 37)

This wasn’t an evangelistic altar call. This was a national-level moment of conviction over rejecting Christ. The question wasn’t, “How do I get saved in general?” but “How do we respond to what we’ve done?”

SECTION 2: 🧠 What Does “For the Remission of Sins” Mean?

Greek phrase: εἰς ἄφεσιν ἁμαρτιῶν

Many assume εἰς (“for”) always means “in order to get” — but that’s not true.

📚 SECTION 2A: 🧾 Greek Words Often Have Multiple Meanings

Greek — like English — has words with flexible meanings, depending on the context.

Example from English:

“I ran for office” ≠ “I ran for cover” ≠ “I ran for president”

Likewise, the Greek word εἰς can mean:

• “into”

• “unto”

• “because of”

• “with reference to”

• “in view of”

📖 Greek scholars and lexicons (e.g., BDAG, Thayer) confirm this.

SECTION 2B: Matthew 12:41 and More — “For” Often Means “Because Of”

Many argue that the word “for” in Acts 2:38 must mean “in order to obtain” forgiveness. But in Greek, just like in English, words have multiple meanings depending on context.

The Greek word used is εἰς (eis), which can mean:

• “into”

• “unto”

• “toward”

• “because of”

• “with reference to”

Let’s look at multiple examples that prove εἰς sometimes means “because of”, not “in order to get.”

🔹 1. Matthew 12:41 — Repented because of preaching

“They repented at the preaching of Jonas…”
Greek: ἐμετανόησαν εἰς τὸ κήρυγμα Ἰωνᾶ

• The Ninevites didn’t repent to obtain Jonah’s preaching — they repented because of it.

• Here, εἰς clearly means “on the basis of” or “in response to.”

🔹 2. Matthew 3:11 — Baptized because of repentance

“I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance…”
Greek: ἐγὼ μὲν βαπτίζω ὑμᾶς ἐν ὕδατι εἰς μετάνοιαν

• John’s baptism was not to cause repentance — it was because of repentance.

• They were baptized in light of their change of heart.

👉 Same construction as Acts 2:38:

“Be baptized eis [because of] the remission of sins.”

🔹 3. Romans 4:20 — Gave glory to God (in response)

“[Abraham] was strong in faith, giving glory to God.”
Greek: δούς δόξαν τῷ θεῷ εἰς δόξαν τῷ θεῷ

• Abraham didn’t act to get God’s glory. He acted because God is glorious.

• εἰς reflects direction or reference, not causation.

🔹 4. 1 Corinthians 10:2 — Baptized unto Moses (identification)

“All were baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea.”
Greek: ἐβαπτίσαντο εἰς τὸν Μωϋσῆν

• They weren’t baptized to obtain Moses — they were identifying with him as leader.

• εἰς here means connection, not causation.

🔹 5. Romans 6:3 — Baptized into death (symbolic association)

“Know ye not… as many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?”

• Believers were baptized into identification with Christ’s death — not to achieve it.

• Again, εἰς expresses association — not causation or merit.

✅ So What’s the Point?

In all of these verses, εἰς does not mean “in order to get” something:

• Not to get preaching (Matt 12:41)

• Not to get repentance (Matt 3:11)

• Not to get Moses (1 Cor 10:2)

• Not to get death (Rom 6:3)

📌 That’s why in Acts 2:38, “be baptized for the remission of sins” means:
“Be baptized because your sins have been forgiven — as a public testimony and identification.”

SECTION 3: 📖 Clear Scripture Comparison

Acts 2:38 must match the rest of Scripture. Here's what we find:

📌 Forgiveness is based on faith or repentance — never on water baptism.

SECTION 4: 🔗 Sentence Flow — Repentance is the Key

“Repent, and
be baptized every one of you… for the remission of sins…”

Here’s what you need to know:

• “Repent” = plural (spoken to the group)

• “Be baptized” = singular (spoken to each individual)

• “For the remission of sins” = most naturally linked to “repent”

So the meaning is:

“Repent [all of you] for the remission of sins — and let each of you be baptized…”

Forgiveness comes through repentance. Baptism follows it, not causes it.

SECTION 5: 🔥 Objections Answered

❌ Objection: “The word ‘for’ means to get forgiveness.”

❗ Answer:
That’s only one possible meaning. As we showed:

• “He got a medal for bravery” = because of bravery.

• “He got a ticket for speeding” = because he was speeding.

Likewise, “be baptized for the remission of sins” = because your sins have been forgiven.

❌ Objection: “Peter said it — don’t argue with him!”

✅ Answer:
We’re not arguing with Peter — we’re agreeing with everything Peter said.

Later in Acts 10, Peter says:

“Whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.”
(v.43)

And those people received the Holy Spirit before baptism.

❌ Objection: “If baptism isn’t required, why is it urgent?”

✅ Answer:
Because baptism is the public act of loyalty and identification with Jesus. Especially for Jews, it was bold — showing they now stood with the One they once rejected.

Urgent obedience doesn’t mean essential for salvation.

✅ FINAL CONCLUSION:

Acts 2:38 teaches:

• Repentance is what brings forgiveness.

• Baptism follows as a public, obedient step — not to earn salvation.

This agrees with:

• Peter’s own later teaching (Acts 10:43–48)

• Paul’s gospel (Romans 4:5, Galatians 2:16)

• Jesus’ promises (John 3:16, Luke 7:50)

📌 “For the remission of sins” can and often does mean “because of forgiveness,” just like in Matthew 12:41.

To make baptism part of the saving gospel is to add a work to grace — and contradict dozens of clear verses that say we are saved by faith alone.

Bulletproof Refutation: Acts 9:17-18 and Acts 22:16 — Was Paul Saved Before or After Baptism?

🔥 BAPTISMAL CLAIM:

"Acts 22:16 proves Paul wasn't saved until baptism. It says, 'Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins.' Therefore, baptism is the moment when sins are forgiven."

✅ THE TRUTH: PAUL WAS SAVED BEFORE BAPTISM

The full biblical testimony—from Acts 9, Acts 22, and Acts 26—shows that Paul was already saved before baptism:

SECTION 1: TIMELINE OF EVENTS

1. Acts 9:1–18 (Historical Narrative)

• Paul encounters Jesus and says, "Who art thou, Lord?" (v.5)

• Jesus replies, "I am Jesus whom thou persecutest."

• Paul trembles, submits, and is blinded—a moment of conviction and faith.

• God tells Ananias that Paul is a "chosen vessel" (v.15)

• Ananias calls him "Brother Saul" (v.17)

• Paul is filled with the Holy Ghost before baptism (v.17)

• Only after this is Paul baptized (v.18)

2. Acts 22:6–16 (Paul’s Testimony)

• Paul again recounts meeting the risen Jesus on the road.

• Jesus gives Paul a mission: "thou shalt be his witness" (v.15)

• Ananias tells Paul to be baptized and wash away sins, "calling on the name of the Lord."

3. Acts 26:12–18 (Courtroom Defense)

• Jesus tells Paul: "I have appeared unto thee for this purpose... to open their eyes... that they may receive forgiveness of sins... by faith that is in me." (v.16–18)

• Jesus links forgiveness to faith, not water.

SECTION 2: ACTS 22:16 — GRAMMAR AND MEANING

KJV: "Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord."

Greek Insight: The phrase "calling on the name of the Lord" (Greek: epikalesamenos) is an aorist middle participle, meaning it happens at the same time or before the main verb.

Literal Flow: "Having called on the name of the Lord, wash away your sins."

The cause of the washing is the calling, not the baptizing.

Compare this with Romans 10:13:

"For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

Paul himself confirms that salvation comes by calling on Christ, not by water.

SECTION 3: PAST TENSE SALVATION

Paul had already:

• Called Jesus "Lord" (Acts 9:5)

• Was praying before Ananias arrived (Acts 9:11)

• Was referred to as "Brother" (Acts 9:17)

• Was filled with the Holy Ghost before baptism (Acts 9:17)

🔎 In the Bible, only believers are called brethren and are filled with the Spirit (cf. Acts 5:32; Romans 8:9).

So why was he baptized?

• As an outward symbol of what had already occurred: his sins were cleansed by faith, not water.

SECTION 4: COMMON OBJECTIONS ANSWERED

❌ Objection 1: "Ananias said wash away your sins at baptism."

🔹 Answer: The participle "calling on the name of the Lord" modifies the verb "wash away". It tells us how the sins were washed away: by calling, not by dipping in water.

❌ Objection 2: "Baptism and calling happened at the same time."

🔹 Answer: Even if simultaneous, the cause is not the act of water immersion. The Scripture never says, "he that is baptized shall be saved by water." It always points to faith or calling on the Lord (see John 3:16, Acts 10:43).

❌ Objection 3: "Paul was told to do both, so both must save."

🔹 Answer: Just because two actions are commanded doesn't mean both cause salvation. Example: "Repent and be baptized" (Acts 2:38) does not mean baptism causes repentance or vice versa.

Ananias gives two imperatives: get baptized (symbol), and call on the Lord (faith).

SECTION 5: PATTERNS IN THE BOOK OF ACTS

SECTION 6: MORE BIBLICAL PROOF

• Ephesians 2:8-9 — Saved by grace through faith, not of works (including water rituals)

• Titus 3:5 — "Not by works of righteousness"

• 1 Corinthians 1:17 — Paul: "Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel."

• Galatians 2:16 — "Justified by faith... not by the works of the law"

• Acts 13:38-39 — Forgiveness through belief, no mention of baptism

CONCLUSION

Paul was already saved, forgiven, Spirit-filled, and praying before baptism. The command to be baptized in Acts 22:16 is tied grammatically and theologically to calling on the Lord — the real source of salvation.

To say Paul was lost until he touched water is to:

• Contradict the inspired order of events

• Misread the Greek participle

• Ignore every other salvation text in Paul’s own writings

"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved." (Acts 16:31)

Claim:

“The book of Acts didn’t originally have verse or chapter numbers, so we can’t be sure of what happened when. That makes it unreliable for doctrine — especially Acts 9 and 22 about Paul’s salvation.”

✅ Refutation: The Absence of Verse Numbers Does Not Invalidate Scripture

✅ 1. Chapters and Verses Are a Later Tool — Not a Flaw

• Yes, it’s true: The original manuscripts of the Bible did not contain chapters or verse numbers.

• These were added centuries later:

  • Chapters: Added by Stephen Langton in A.D. 1227.

  • Verses: Added to the NT by Robert Estienne (Stephanus) in A.D. 1551.

📌 But verse numbers are like page numbers. They help you find things — they don’t change what’s written.

👉 Verse numbers were added by men, but the truth was written by God.

✅ 2. The Text of Acts Is Trustworthy and God-Breathed

• The Book of Acts was universally accepted by the early church as inspired Scripture.

• It appears in all major Greek manuscripts — including the Textus Receptus.

• Its history is affirmed in other Scripture:

  • Galatians 1–2 confirms Paul’s calling.

  • 2 Peter 3:15–16 calls Paul’s writings “Scripture.”

  • Romans, 1 Timothy, Philippians all reference Acts events.

📖 Matthew 24:35 — “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”

📖 Psalm 12:6–7 — “Thou shalt preserve them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation forever.”

✅ 3. Early Christians Used Acts Without Chapters or Verses — And Trusted It

• Church fathers like Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen, and Athanasius quoted Acts authoritatively.

• They trusted the events and teachings even when citing longer text segments.

• This proves that verse numbers were never necessary to trust Acts or build doctrine from it.

✅ 4. Double Standard: They Trust Acts When It Benefits Them

• Baptismal regenerationists quote Acts 2:38 and Acts 22:16 constantly — WITH verse numbers.

• But when confronted with Acts 10:43–48, Acts 15:7–11, or Acts 9, they suddenly object to structure.

📌 If Acts can’t be trusted, they must stop quoting it. But they don’t — because they only reject it when it hurts their theology.

“The absence of original verse numbers never blurred the truth — only false teachers do that.”

✅ Final Summary:

• Chapter/verse divisions help us read and navigate — they don’t change doctrine.

• The text of Acts is fully inspired and preserved.

• Paul’s salvation timeline is clearly shown and affirmed across the New Testament.

• Those who reject Acts only do so to avoid its devastating contradiction to their false gospel.

🔒 This argument is not only weak — it backfires on them.

🔥 Claim:

Romans 6:3–4 teaches that water baptism unites a person to Christ’s death and resurrection — therefore, baptism is when salvation happens.

“Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death…” (Romans 6:3–4, KJV)

✅ Refutation: Romans 6 Does Not Teach Baptismal Regeneration

🔹 1. Context: Paul Is Writing to Already Saved People

• Romans 6 follows chapters 1–5, where Paul clearly taught justification by faith alone (see Romans 4:5, 5:1).

• Romans 6 addresses what happens after one has been justified: how a believer should walk in newness of life.

• The audience is already saved:

  “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?” (Romans 6:1)

  • That question only makes sense if the audience is already under grace.

🔹 2. The Word “Baptized” Is Often Used Figuratively in Scripture

• “Baptism” doesn’t always mean water — it can represent identification or immersion into a reality:

  • 1 Corinthians 10:2 — Israelites “baptized unto Moses” without touching water.

  • Mark 10:38–39 — Jesus referred to His death as a baptism.

  • Galatians 3:27 — “Baptized into Christ” = positional identity, not a water ritual.

🔍 Greek word: βαπτίζω (baptizō) — means to immerse, unite, or identify with. It’s used in both literal and metaphorical senses.

• In Romans 6, it refers to being immersed into Christ’s death — a spiritual reality, not a physical dunking.

🔹 3. Romans 6 Is Describing Our Union with Christ — Through Faith

• Romans 6:4 says:

  “Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised… even so we also should walk in newness of life.”

• That “like as… even so” shows Paul is using figurative analogy — not literal water mechanics.

• The union with Christ described here is explained elsewhere as occurring at the moment of faith:

  “That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith…” (Ephesians 3:17) “Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:26)

• If Paul believed baptism saved, Romans 4 would not emphasize faith “without works” — yet that’s exactly what it does.

🔹 4. If Romans 6:3–4 Meant Water Baptism Saves, It Would Contradict Romans 4–5

• Romans 4:5 — “To him that worketh not, but believeth on him… his faith is counted for righteousness.”

• Romans 5:1 — “Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God…”

📌 If baptism were essential to receive righteousness, Paul would not say “worketh not.”

• Romans 6 transitions to the topic of sanctification, not justification. It assumes salvation has already happened.

✅ Conclusion:

• Romans 6:3–4 does not teach salvation by water baptism.

• It describes the spiritual identification believers have with Christ’s death and resurrection — a result of faith, not ritual.

• Water baptism is a symbol of that reality, not the cause of it.

🔒 Romans 6 teaches sanctification truths to believers — not regeneration through water. The word “water” never appears in this chapter. Baptismal regenerationists are reading their doctrine into the text.

 

Claim:

Galatians 3:27 teaches that baptism is what unites us to Christ — therefore, baptism is the moment salvation occurs.

“For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” (Galatians 3:27, KJV)

---

✅ Refutation: Galatians 3:27 Teaches Symbolic Union — Not Salvation by Baptism

🔹 1. Context Must Begin with Galatians 3:26

• Just one verse earlier, Paul declares:

  “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.” (Galatians 3:26, KJV)

• This is critical. Verse 26 gives the means of becoming a child of God — faith, not baptism.

• Verse 27 then describes what happens to those who have already believed: they have been outwardly identified with Christ.

📌 Galatians 3:27 does not contradict verse 26 — it expands on it. 📌 While verse numbers were added later, the flow of Paul’s thought is inspired and consistent.

🔹 2. “Baptized into Christ” = Identification, Not Regeneration

• The phrase “baptized into Christ” mirrors Romans 6:3 — a figurative union with Christ, not a water ritual.

• Greek word: ἐβαπτίσθητε (ebaptisthēte) — can refer to:

  • Literal immersion in water

  • Or metaphorical immersion into a person, status, or idea (see 1 Cor 10:2; Mark 10:39)

• The context of Galatians 3 is about inheritance and sonship by promise, not rituals:

  “That the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” (Galatians 3:22)

📌 Greek words often have multiple meanings depending on context. Paul uses the same term figuratively in multiple places.

🔹 3. “Put on Christ” = New Identity, Not New Birth

• The phrase “put on Christ” (ἐνεδύσασθε) means to be clothed in His righteousness — a metaphor for identity and fellowship, not initiation into salvation.

• This does not mean “born again.” It refers to putting on the outward profession and lifestyle that matches faith.

• Elsewhere, Paul uses “put on” language to describe behavior and sanctification:

  “Put on the new man…” (Ephesians 4:24) “Put on the armour of light.” (Romans 13:12)

📌 This supports the interpretation that baptism here symbolizes the believer’s new identity, not the means of regeneration.

🔹 4. Baptism Does Not Create Sonship — Faith Does

• Galatians 3:26 makes it indisputable:

  “Ye are all the children of God by faith…”

• Baptism in v.27 is a result of that new status, not the cause.

• To say that baptism makes you a child of God contradicts the verse directly before it.

🔹 5. Paul’s Consistent Gospel Elsewhere Refutes Baptismal Salvation

• Ephesians 2:8 — “By grace… through faith… not of works.”

• Romans 4:5 — “To him that worketh not…”

• 1 Corinthians 1:17 — “Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.”

If baptism were required to receive eternal life, Paul’s gospel would be incomplete.

---

✅ Conclusion:

• Galatians 3:27 shows that those who are already saved by faith now express that identity by putting on Christ — symbolized by baptism.

• There is no water in the context.

• There is no statement that baptism regenerates or creates sonship.

• Salvation occurred in verse 26 — baptism followed.

🔒 Galatians 3:27 affirms baptism as a symbol of faith-union — not the source of it. It cannot be separated from verse 26 without misrepresenting Paul’s point.

 

Claim:

Colossians 2:12 teaches that baptism is the means of being spiritually raised with Christ — therefore, regeneration happens at water baptism.

“Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.”
(Colossians 2:12, KJV)

---

✅ Refutation: Colossians 2:12 Teaches Faith-Resurrection — Not Baptismal Regeneration

---

🔹 1. The Verse Itself Says Faith Is the Instrument — Not Baptism

“...ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God...”

The resurrection is not caused by water baptism, but by faith — clearly stated in the verse.

• Greek phrase: διὰ τῆς πίστεως = through the faith

• This is a genitive of means — showing the channel or instrument through which God operates.

📌 Key point: The resurrection is not “in baptism,” but through faith — a personal trust in God’s saving power.

💣 Heretic Misuse Anticipated: Some claim “wherein” (KJV) refers to baptism as the cause of resurrection.
However, the structure of the verse links resurrection to faith, not the symbolic burial in baptism. The operation (ἐνέργειας) of God is applied through belief, not through ritual.

---

🔹 2. Baptism = Burial Symbol, Not Source of Life

“Buried with him in baptism…”

This describes a symbolic death to sin, not a literal event that causes spiritual rebirth.

• Romans 6:4 echoes this: “we are buried with him by baptism into death…”

• Baptism is the outward picture of what faith has already accomplished inwardly.

📌 Baptism represents the old man being buried.
It does not cause the new man to be born.

---

🔹 3. Context: Circumcision Without Hands (v.11) Shows Spiritual Operation

“...ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands…” (v.11)

Paul is emphasizing internal transformation, not physical rites.

• The circumcision “without hands” points to heart change by the Spirit.

• Baptism is placed alongside this as part of the imagery, not the cause.

Just as circumcision was a sign of identity, baptism is a symbol of spiritual truths — not a sacrament of regeneration.

---

🔹 4. Verse 13 Confirms: The Real Transformation Is Spiritual

“And you... hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses.” (Col 2:13)

• “Hath he quickened” (συνεζωοποίησεν) is past tense — already done by God, not during baptism.

• “Forgiven you all trespasses” reinforces that faith — not ritual — was the basis of salvation.

This verse confirms that the true spiritual resurrection is internal, final, and apart from any work.

---

🔹 5. Greek Terms Confirm the Priority of Faith

• διὰ τῆς πίστεως — "through the faith": faith is the channel of God’s saving power.

• ἐνέργειας — "operation": God is the active agent; baptism is not.

The verse clearly teaches that resurrection happens by God's power, not by the performance of baptism.

---

🔹 6. Paul’s Broader Gospel Denies Regeneration by Ritual

• 1 Corinthians 1:17 — “Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel.”

• Ephesians 2:8–9 — “By grace are ye saved through faith… not of works.”

• Romans 4:5 — “To him that worketh not, but believeth…”

📌 If baptism were regenerative, Paul would not have distanced it from the gospel itself.

---

🔒 Conclusion:

Colossians 2:12 does not teach baptismal regeneration.

Instead, it upholds the doctrine that:

• Baptism pictures burial, not salvation.

• Resurrection happens through faith, not ritual.

• The transformation is internal and spiritual, not external and mechanical.

💥 Any interpretation that makes baptism the cause of new life contradicts both the grammar and the surrounding context.

CLAIM:

1 Corinthians 12:13 teaches that all believers are baptized into one body — the body of Christ — and this must mean water baptism is necessary for salvation.

“For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body... and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 12:13, KJV)

---

✅ REFUTATION: Spirit Baptism Places Believers into Christ — Not Water Baptism

---

🔹 1. The Baptism Here Is Done by the Spirit, Not in Water

Paul says clearly:

“By one Spirit are we all baptized…”

The Greek preposition ἐν (“in/by/with”) here is best understood as instrumental — by means of the Spirit.

• Paul is not describing a ritual done by human hands (like water baptism),

• but a supernatural action done by the Holy Spirit Himself at the moment of faith.

📌 Greek insight for lay readers:
In Greek, ἐν ἑνὶ Πνεύματι = “by one Spirit,” not “in water.” This same construction is used in verses like Matthew 3:11:

“He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire.”

The idea is clear: this is Spirit baptism, not physical immersion.

---

🔹 2. The Purpose: Unity in the Body — Not Salvation by Water

The entire chapter is about the spiritual unity of believers in the body of Christ.

• The moment we believe, we are joined to the body of Christ — the universal Church.

• Water baptism doesn’t place anyone into the body; only the Holy Spirit does.

Paul says this Spirit baptism applies to:

“Jews or Gentiles, bond or free…”

It transcends earthly rituals. If this were about water, it would depend on human obedience or church access — but every believer is Spirit-baptized immediately at faith.

---

🔹 3. Refutes the Heretical Use of Acts 2:38 or Galatians 3:27

Baptismal regenerationists often cite Acts 2:38 (“be baptized… for the remission of sins”) and link it with 1 Corinthians 12:13 to say you’re not in the body without water baptism.

But Acts 10:44–48 proves otherwise:

“While Peter yet spake… the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word…”
And only after that, they were baptized in water.

📌 So the order is:

1. They believed.

2. They received the Spirit.

3. Then they were baptized in water.

Thus, Spirit baptism precedes water baptism — not the other way around.

---

🔹 4. Cross-References Confirm Spirit Baptism Happens at Faith

• Ephesians 1:13 — “After ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise.”

• Romans 8:9 — “If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.”

• Galatians 3:2 — “Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?”

Nowhere does Paul say water is the cause of receiving the Spirit.

---

🔹 5. Paul Denies Water Baptism as Part of the Gospel Message

“For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel…” (1 Corinthians 1:17)

If baptism were required to enter the body of Christ, Paul would not separate it from the gospel.

---

✅ Conclusion:

1 Corinthians 12:13 teaches that every believer is placed into the body of Christ by the Holy Spirit at the moment of faith — not by water.

• The Spirit is the agent.

• Faith is the condition.

• Unity is the result.

• Water is not in view.

Baptismal regeneration misuses this verse by inserting ritual into a passage about supernatural rebirth.

---

🔒 Final Summary Statement:

1 Corinthians 12:13 teaches Spirit baptism, not water regeneration.
Every believer is united to Christ at the moment of faith — not through a tub, but through the Holy Ghost.

 

Claim: 1 Peter 3:21 plainly says “baptism doth also now save us,” therefore, water baptism is required for salvation.

📖 Verse Used: “Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water. The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.” (1 Peter 3:20–21, KJV)

---

✅ Refutation: Peter Teaches Salvation by Faith, Not by Water

🔹 1. Context: Noah Was Saved Through Water, Not By Water

• The Greek phrase is δι’ ὕδατος — “through water”, not “by means of water.”

• Noah wasn’t saved by the flood but through it — the water was judgment.

• The ark saved Noah — a type of Christ (Genesis 6:14, Hebrews 11:7).

• If water was the savior, then those who drowned were saved.

💡 Typological Point: Noah’s ark = Christ. Water = judgment. The water didn’t save; the ark did.

🔹 2. Greek Word for “Figure” = Symbol, Not Substance

• “The like figure” is from ἀντίτυπον (antitypon) — meaning a type, symbol, or representation.

• The verse literally says: “Baptism, which corresponds to this figure, now saves…”

• It is not saying baptism is the literal cause of salvation.

✍️ Greek words often carry multiple meanings, and in this case, antitypon is never used to mean a saving agent — it’s a symbolic parallel.

🔹 3. Parenthetical Clarification: Not the Water, But the Conscience

Peter clarifies:

“Not the putting away of the filth of the flesh…”

• This denies that physical washing (i.e., water baptism) is what saves.

• Instead, salvation is:

  “The answer of a good conscience toward God…”

This refers to the faith-response of the heart — an internal appeal to God.

📌 If baptism were salvific, Peter would not stop to say it’s not about washing the body.

🔹 4. Final Clause Points to Resurrection Power — Not Baptismal Water

“…by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

• This is the real basis of salvation — not water, but Christ’s victory over death.

• Paul agrees: “If Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.” (1 Corinthians 15:17)

🔹 5. Other Scripture Makes This Clear

• 1 Peter 1:23 — “Being born again… by the word of God,” not by water.

• 1 Peter 1:9 — “Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.”

• 1 Peter 1:21 — “Who by him do believe in God… that your faith and hope might be in God.”

• Hebrews 11:7 — Noah was saved “by faith,” not by water.

🧠 If Peter believed baptism saves, why didn’t he say that in 1 Peter 1 when discussing regeneration?

---

✅ Conclusion:

Peter explicitly defines the baptism that saves as not the physical ritual, but the spiritual response of faith — a good conscience appealing to God, made possible through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Water is symbolic, not salvific.

🛡 1 Peter 3:21, rightly understood, affirms salvation by faith — not baptismal regeneration.

Claim: Hebrews 10:22 teaches water baptism is necessary for salvation, since it says our “bodies [are] washed with pure water.”

“Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water.” (Hebrews 10:22, KJV)

---

✅ Refutation: This Refers to Spiritual Access, Not Baptismal Regeneration

🔹 1. Context Is About Access, Not Salvation

Hebrews 10:19–22 is not an evangelistic appeal. It is an invitation to believers to draw near to God:

“Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus…” (Hebrews 10:19)

The audience is already saved: they are called “brethren” with present access into the holiest.

The call is to draw near in fellowship and worship, not to receive justification.

---

🔹 2. Old Testament Typology: Spiritual, Not Literal

The language in Hebrews 10:22 is figurative priestly language drawn from the Old Testament:

• “Hearts sprinkled” echoes Exodus 29:20–21, where blood was sprinkled on priests.

• “Bodies washed with pure water” echoes Exodus 29:4; Leviticus 8:6, where priests were ceremonially washed.

📌 These were ritual symbols of inward preparation. In the New Covenant, this imagery pictures our spiritual cleansing at salvation — not literal water baptism.

Hebrews shows that Jesus fulfilled these shadows (Hebrews 9:8–14). Now, inward cleansing by His blood makes us priests (cf. 1 Peter 2:9).

Also note: not everyone in the OT was washed—only priests. Hebrews uses this priestly imagery to show all believers now have priestly standing before God.

---

🔹 3. Greek Structure Proves Symbolic Parallelism

Greek term: λελουσμένοι (lelousmenoi) — perfect passive participle of louō, meaning “to bathe, wash.”

But this word is used figuratively in multiple NT texts:

• John 13:10 — “He that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet…” (spiritual cleansing)

• Revelation 1:5 — “Washed us from our sins in his own blood”

Both “hearts sprinkled” and “bodies washed” are perfect passive participles — parallel in grammar and structure.

📌 If one is figurative (spiritual sprinkling by Christ’s blood), the other is also figurative (spiritual washing by the Word/Spirit).

To call one symbolic and the other literal is grammatically inconsistent.

Greek words carry multiple meanings, and context determines the right one. Here, spiritual access through blood (not baptism) dominates the passage.

---

🔹 4. Fulfillment of Ezekiel 36 Prophecy — Not a Ritual

The phrase “pure water” echoes Ezekiel 36:25–27:

“Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean… A new heart also will I give you… and I will put my Spirit within you.”

This is not a baptismal command, but a prophetic picture of spiritual cleansing through the New Covenant — fulfilled by faith, not physical water.

Hebrews is showing that prophecy fulfilled in those who trust Christ, not those who undergo ritual.

---

🔹 5. The Grammar Shows a Completed Spiritual Act

“Having… our bodies washed with pure water” uses the perfect passive participle — indicating a completed action with ongoing results.

This describes what already happened at salvation, not a command to be baptized.

---

🔹 6. Hebrews Emphasizes Internal, Once-for-All Cleansing

Hebrews 10:10 — “sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all”

Hebrews 10:14 — “perfected forever them that are sanctified”

The cleansing is not progressive, not ritualistic, and not dependent on baptism. It is the once-for-all work of Christ received by faith.

---

🔹 7. Faith Is the Emphasis, Not Ritual

“Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith…” (v.22)

This drawing near is anchored in assurance of faith, not works, ceremonies, or ordinances.

Water is never named as a saving agent in Hebrews — blood is:

• Hebrews 9:12 — “by his own blood… having obtained eternal redemption”

• Hebrews 10:19 — “boldness to enter… by the blood of Jesus”

---

🔹 8. John 3:5 Cannot Be Forced into Hebrews 10:22

Some try to link Hebrews 10:22 to John 3:5 (“born of water and of the Spirit”). But:

• John 3 is about the new birth

• Hebrews 10 is about worship access and spiritual privilege for those already born again

📌 Forcing these passages together is a category error. They have different audiences, purposes, and contexts.

---

🔹 9. This Passage Assumes the Reader Is Already Saved

“Let us draw near” = fellowship, not justification

“Hearts sprinkled” = already purified

“Bodies washed” = already cleansed

You don’t tell unbelievers to “draw near in full assurance of faith.” You invite them to believe (cf. John 3:16).

---

✅ Conclusion: Hebrews 10:22 does not teach baptismal regeneration. Instead, it:

• Uses OT priestly imagery to describe the spiritual standing of believers

• Emphasizes cleansing by Christ’s blood, not water

• Anchors approach to God in faith, not ritual

• Speaks to those who are already saved, not seeking salvation

🔒 To use Hebrews 10:22 to support baptismal regeneration is to misread grammar, context, Old Testament typology, and the entire message of the book of Hebrews.

“Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus…” (Hebrews 10:19)

It is by blood, not baptism.

 

SECTION 14: Titus 3:5 — Does “Washing of Regeneration” Mean Baptismal Salvation?

“Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost.” (Titus 3:5, KJV)

---

🔥 False Claim by Baptismal Regenerationists:

Proponents claim the phrase “washing of regeneration” refers to water baptism, making it essential for salvation.

---

✅ Free Grace Refutation: This Refers to Spiritual Renewal, Not Water Baptism

---

🔹 1. The Verse Begins by Explicitly Denying All Works — Including Baptism

• “Not by works of righteousness which we have done…” — Paul excludes all human deeds, especially religious acts.

• Water baptism is a righteous deed done in obedience — yet here, Paul says such works do not save.

• To interpret this verse as teaching salvation by a work (baptism) directly contradicts its opening line.

• Logical collapse: You can’t insert a “work” into a verse that explicitly says salvation isn’t by works.

🔑 Conclusion: If baptism is a “work” — and it is — then it is ruled out by the grammar of the verse itself.

---

🔹 2. “Washing” Is a Figurative Term for Inner Cleansing

• Greek word: λουτροῦ (loutrou) — noun form of louō, “to wash” or “bathe.”

• Occurs only twice in the NT:

  • Ephesians 5:26 — “washing of water by the word” — clearly figurative; no water baptism mentioned.

  • Titus 3:5 — again, no mention of water, only inner transformation.

• In both cases, the emphasis is on cleansing by the Word or the Spirit, not H₂O.

🔍 Grammatical Insight: If Paul meant water baptism, the Greek βαπτίζω (baptizō) would be used — but it’s absent here.

---

🔹 3. Regeneration = New Birth, Not Baptism

• Greek term παλιγγενεσία (palingenesia) — “rebirth” or “renewal.”

• Appears in:

  • Titus 3:5

  • Matthew 19:28 — “regeneration” of the world.

• In Titus, it speaks of the new birth given by the Spirit, not an ordinance administered by man.

📖 Compare with John 1:13 — “Which were born… of God.” The new birth is spiritual, not procedural.

---

🔹 4. The Parallel Phrase “Renewing of the Holy Ghost” Explains It

• Titus 3:5 presents synonymous parallelism (a Hebraic poetic structure):

  • “by the washing of regeneration”

  • “and renewing of the Holy Ghost”

• These are two ways of saying the same thing: the internal transformation by the Spirit.

• This is not something you do, but something God does to you.

🔑 Baptism is never called a “renewing of the Holy Ghost.” This is Spirit baptism, not water.

---

🔹 5. Paul Uses “Washed” Figuratively Elsewhere

• 1 Corinthians 6:11 — “But ye are washed, but ye are sanctified… by the Spirit of our God.”

• No water involved — just Spirit-wrought cleansing.

• Hebrews 10:22 — “bodies washed with pure water” is OT priestly imagery, not literal baptism.

🧼 Conclusion: Paul consistently uses “washing” as a metaphor for inner cleansing, not immersion in water.

---

🔹 6. The Context is Divine Mercy, Not Human Action

• Titus 3:4–7 describes God’s mercy, kindness, and grace as the grounds of salvation.

• Notice the structure:

  • v.4: “Kindness and love of God…”

  • v.5: “Not by works… but by His mercy…”

  • v.6: “Holy Ghost… shed on us abundantly…”

  • v.7: “Being justified by his grace…”

• There is zero mention of human participation — it’s all God's initiative.

📌 If baptism were required, Paul would have said so — but instead, he points to God’s mercy alone.

---

🔹 7. Titus 3:5 Must Be Interpreted with Titus 3:7

“That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs…”

• Justification = by grace, not by water.

• The entire passage is a doctrinal slam-dunk for grace through faith, not ritual obedience.

---

🔐 Conclusion: Titus 3:5 Destroys Baptismal Regeneration

• ❌ Baptism is a work of righteousness — but the verse rules out all works.

• ❌ “Washing” is symbolic of internal cleansing, not external immersion.

• ✅ The Spirit is the sole agent of regeneration and renewal.

• ✅ No mention of water, no command to be baptized, no ritual in view.

• ✅ Context: all mercy, all grace, all God — no human contribution.

✝️ “According to His mercy He saved us” — not according to a baptistery.

This is a theological fortress built on grace, Scripture, and careful exegesis — baptismal regeneration crumbles beneath it.